Hi
I would like to give some news about romcenter 3 as I'm spending quite some times on it actually.
So, I built (again ) a new repair engine. It will allow more flexibility like managing samples and chd (not yet done). It loads also very quickly at startup: 5 sec for a mame set with 3 folders and more than 3000 files.
It can actually load mame xml datafiles.
It is working quite well now for normal roms. I fixed more than 3000 files without problems (took 24 min, I don't know how cl*m*me perform... anyone ?)
But It still needs a lot of work. I still have to add corrupted files support, to hook progress windows and other gui items, add items level fix in view, add samples and chd support etc...
But things are coming nicely. I just finished removing all memory leaks.
I will do my best to post more wip reports, and as soon as I got something usable, I will publish an alpha for a test in the wild.
If you have questions, you can post them.
RomCenter 3 report
RomCenter 3 report
Eric - RomCenter developer
Report bugs here.
Report bugs here.
No, rebuilding is not fixing.
I made the test myself with the same 3300 files. It tooks clrmame 22 min to sort them (24 min with the wip rc 3).
I found also that the sorted files are not exactly the same in clrmame and romcenter 3...
I will check each differences to see who's right.
I made the test myself with the same 3300 files. It tooks clrmame 22 min to sort them (24 min with the wip rc 3).
I found also that the sorted files are not exactly the same in clrmame and romcenter 3...
I will check each differences to see who's right.
Eric - RomCenter developer
Report bugs here.
Report bugs here.
Nice comparison, Q-Marine.
For me CLRMame is a nightmare because of its extremely unusual handling.
Things I find in seconds in RomCenter take me minutes to scour the manual for in CM
@Eric, stop worrying about "time races".
I think many things matter:
- CPU speed (and kind of CPU you use, single core, double core...)
- HD speed!!!
There are 10,000 RPM "Raptor" types out now, and of course they dash past the 7,200 RPM ones with flying colors
For me this is an "apples to oranges" comparison attempt ...
For me CLRMame is a nightmare because of its extremely unusual handling.
Things I find in seconds in RomCenter take me minutes to scour the manual for in CM
@Eric, stop worrying about "time races".
I think many things matter:
- CPU speed (and kind of CPU you use, single core, double core...)
- HD speed!!!
There are 10,000 RPM "Raptor" types out now, and of course they dash past the 7,200 RPM ones with flying colors
For me this is an "apples to oranges" comparison attempt ...
Yep, you're right, but it gave me an idea of the 'usability' of the new engine.
Eric - RomCenter developer
Report bugs here.
Report bugs here.
Hi Eric. Very happy to see that you've found time for RC3. Great news.RomCenter wrote:I would like to give some news about romcenter 3 as I'm spending quite some times on it actually.
Yup, forget about it. The one and only reason i dumped CLRMame from the beginning: RC is very user-friendly, CM is certainly not. It may do the job and have a good engine and all but compared to RC, you need a manual just to execute it!grotty74 wrote:For me CLRMame is a nightmare because of its extremely unusual handling.
Things I find in seconds in RomCenter take me minutes to scour the manual for in CM
Eric, please don't stop worrying!grotty74 wrote:@Eric, stop worrying about "time races".
Ok, a better message would be "don't worry so much". 22 -> 24 mins, who cares. If it was 22 -> 44 mins, everybody would care!
Have fun
W.
- Wanderer -
RomCenter: Main site, Bug reporting & enhancement requests, Wiki
RCDBManager: Main site, Bug reporting & enhancement requests, Wiki
RomCenter: Main site, Bug reporting & enhancement requests, Wiki
RCDBManager: Main site, Bug reporting & enhancement requests, Wiki